Images of “gatekeeping”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56883/aijmt.2024.569

Abstract

An increased attention to anti-oppressive practices has informed critical explorations of ‘gatekeeping’ in the music therapy profession, including issues pertaining to academic education, supervision, and ethics (Gombert, 2022; Hicks, 2020; Hsiao, 2014; Wetherick, 2024). Gatekeeping practices, as Fansler et al. (2019) write, become established based on which knowledges are regarded as acceptable or unacceptable. Such knowledges depend on

understandings about health and illness, disabled and enabled, therapist and “client,” teacher and student, “appropriate” behaviors, “inappropriate” language (including censorship of participants, minoritized music therapists, and musics within music therapy practice, as well as the elevation of “standard English” in academic contexts), who is “at risk,” what is normal, and so on. These understandings lead us to construct academic requirements/curricula, standards of practice, professional competencies, codes of ethics, research standards, and so on, which all work to reinforce the borders that have been constructed in the development of the profession. (Fansler et al., 2019)

These layers of gatekeeping shape our professional discourse and underpin the behind-thescenes processes of academic publishing too. Indeed, journal editors and peer reviewers are often perceived as ‘gatekeepers’ holding the power to legitimise research findings and influence the construction of knowledge and future professional directions in a field. Such power is not neutral. It involves highly complex processes coloured by sociocultural influences, disciplinary assumptions and, at times, competing professional agendas and power dynamics.

In this editorial, we take a step sideways to share our views and experiences of ‘gatekeeping’ as editors of Approaches as it completes its 15th anniversary. Each of us reflects creatively, drawing on images of gates, sounds, and metaphors. We invite you, the reader, to engage with these reflections as invitations, opening a space to consider your respective experiences too.

Author Biographies

  • Andeline dos Santos, University of Pretoria, South Africa

    Andeline Dos Santos, DMus, is a senior lecturer in music therapy and the research coordinator in the School of the Arts at the University of Pretoria. She serves as co-editor-in-chief of Approaches.
    [andeline.dossantos@up.ac.za]

  • Nicky Haire, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, UK

    Nicky Haire is a lecturer in music therapy at Queen Margaret University Edinburgh. She serves as associate editor of Approaches. [nhaire@qmu.ac.uk]

  • Lucy Bolger, University of Melbourne, Australia

    Lucy Bolger is a senior lecturer in music therapy at the Melbourne Conservatorium of Music, Australia. She serves as associate editor of Approaches. [bolger.l@unimelb.edu.au]

  • Giorgos Tsiris, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, UK St Columba’s Hospice Care, UK

    Giorgos Tsiris, PhD, is the Director of Education, Research, and Creative Arts at St Columba’s Hospice Care and a senior lecturer in music therapy at Queen Margaret University Edinburgh. He is the founding editor of Approaches. [gtsiris@qmu.ac.uk]

Published

2024-12-23

Issue

Section

Editorial